So according to Tom Brokaw, Obama's multiple scandals are not as bad as Abu Ghraib. You remember that's when some soldiers humiliated a few Iraqi POWs, were court-martialed and went to prison.
Let's see, Tom. The difference is Bush was not involved in the one scandal while Obama is up to his neck in the many scandals. Furthermore, Dan Rather and the sleaze merchant liberal news media broke the story on Abu Ghraib even though they'd been asked by the government to hold off on it for national security reasons, while the same sleaze merchant liberal news media, until the AP scandal came to light, has been silent about all of Obama's sins even though they include national security breaches, and so far, nobody has been held accountable.
Yeah there's a real comparison there. Nobody died at Abu Ghraib, no liberals were targeted by the IRS, no reporters were spied upon by the DOJ, no lies were told by the Secretary of State or the White House, and what do you know, it really wasn't Bush's fault!
Go bury your head back in the sand, Tom. You look less foolish that way.
