Betrayed for Political Agenda

If this doesn't make you angry you aren't a true American. As more and more information becomes available about the events in Libya on September 11, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the White House and the entire administration is engaging in a coverup of apocryphal proportions. Benghazi Gate is so much bigger than Watergate that it demands not only an accounting, not only an impeachment, but a trial for treason.

Four Americans, including an ambassador, are dead, sacrificed for a political agenda designed to protect Obama and his image as a foreign policy giant. Obama's actions during the seven hour attack and the tale he's been weaving ever since are nothing short of treasonous. What is just as appalling is the sold out left-wing news media doing everything it can to divert attention from the facts.

On 9/11 2012, Muslim terrorists attacked the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya. By early the next day the news was out that the ambassador, Chris Stevens, had been killed. That morning Obama made a press announcement in which he stated that acts of terror would not go unpunished, then left for a campaign stop in Las Vegas, Nevada. He never referred to Benghazi as an act of terror.

Four days later on the Sunday talk show circuit, the UN ambassador, Susan Rice, on five different network interviews said the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video that nobody had yet heard of. White House spokesman Jay Carney continued the ruse day after day.

This had everybody scratching their heads. What video? But the Secretary of State continued to promote this wag, and when Obama and Clinton met the bodies being returned home at Andrews Air Force Base, they couldn't keep the video out of their remarks for one minute. Then a week later in a speech at the UN, Obama declared six times that the cause was the video.

While in New York, Obama sent Hilary out to meet with world leaders while he visited the celebrity talk show circuit and said over and over that not all the facts were known and that they were letting the public know as soon as they knew anything. Two weeks passed before Obama finally conceded that it was a terrorist attack.

Then when Paul Ryan confronted Biden at the Vice Presidential debate, Biden, waving his arms all over the place, said that on the day after the attacks they didn't know what had happened. Six days later at the next presidential debate, Obama said he knew and called it a terrorist attack on the day after. Then he feigned offense that Romney could even suggest a coverup was going on.

One has to wonder if even the White House takes Biden seriously. Obama knew, but Biden didn't? Were they keeping it a secret from him?

Lies beget lies beget lies. They must be panicked in the White House because more and more is getting exposed, and over the last week Obama has dodged every question that's come up about Benghazi. Not that there are that many, but some media people are starting to wake up. The Des Moines Register, an ultra liberal newspaper, just came out endorsing Romney.

And more information is leaking out. State Department e-mails are showing that the White House was informed that terrorists were behind the attack within two hours of the attack happening. But wait, there were drones in the air watching events take place, and apparently some people were in the Situation Room at the White House watching. Where was the leader of the free world when that was going on? Where was the messiah who could bring peace to the Middle East when his ambassador was being murdered?

Now we know the attack went on at the consulate, which was a mile away from an annex where an inadequate security team was based because two other units had been withdrawn, even though the embassy had requested increased security. Both places were attacked in a battle that went on for seven hours. Repeated requests for assistance at the consulate were denied until finally Ty Woods and maybe another disobeyed orders and went to the consulate to try and rescue seven people that were trapped there. Several were rescued, but the ambassador and one other were killed.

Running a gauntlet of machine gun fire the Americans raced through the streets in a vehicle with blown tires and made it to the annex. Mortar fire then dropped on the annex until Ty Woods, apparently on a rooftop, located the mortar and targeted it with a laser. There is only one reason a Forward Observer, SEAL team member, or whoever, would beam a laser light at a target like that. He was expecting a smart bomb or cruise missile to be launched at the target. He could only have expected that if he thought assets were in the air to launched the weapons. No weapon was launched. Apparently an order to stand down or canceling the attack had been given.

Right now the entire administration is in denial mode. CIA Director General Petraus announced he gave no such order. But somebody did, and there aren't too many people in the chain of command below the Commander-in-Chief who could give such an order.

Ty Woods was exposed and then fired upon and killed because he was betrayed by the inept, self-serving traitor in the White House. This entire administration is guilty of at the very least gross negligence and incompetence, but at the worst a very vast coverup of Obama's failed leadership and betrayal of Americans who trusted him.

Obama said again yesterday that they were going to find those responsible and make them pay. Why should we believe him? A New York Times reporter found the man claiming to have led the attack sipping a strawberry frappe in a sidewalk cafe in Tripoli. If a liberal journalist from an Obama supporting newspaper can find the mastermind, why can't the Obama administration find him and do something?

It is unfathomable to think that there is anybody left, who would still vote for this lilly-livered scoundrel. He's a spineless coward, the poorest excuse ever to occupy the White House. He's an embarrassment to America and all that is decent and godly. And there are worse descriptions that would fit. Many people think America is about to face God's judgment, but if Obama is re-elected, God won't even have to do anything. Obama will do it for him, and we will have brought it on ourselves. If America doesn't turn him out next week then we deserve him.

What the Betrayer-in-Chief Obama deserves is jail.

The Right to Vote

I am fed up with the pessimistic, fatalistic, burn the bridges, let America go to hell attitude of some Christians who are choosing not to vote for the "lesser of two evils." I received a couple more of these e-mails from I don't know where from far right extremist Christians who have no more common sense than to think that giving up and letting evil triumph is somehow going to please God and give them a clear conscience. How clear are their consciences going to be when the Obama Nazis start forcing them to pay for abortion on demand? How are they going to feel when they find their churches closed and know that they could have done something to stop it but stayed home and did nothing?

I'm reading another loser article called The Christian Nonvoter. Jim Fedako, a Ron Paul supporter, argues that his vote won't "bind Satan in chains," and if you think yours will you are suffering from pride. He declares that there is no Christian duty to vote for president, and turns to Nazi Germany to prove his point. Christians, he claims, voted for Hitler because they thought he was the lesser of two evils and look what they got.

Well, let's take a look at that. First, Fedako has no supporting evidence to make his claim that Christians elected Hitler. He didn't research it. He didn't research German politics in the 1930's either. Hitler was never elected to a public office. He was head of the Nazi party, but he was so undesirable that he couldn't win enough votes to get elected. Unfortunately his party ran people who did win, and by 1932, when they won a majority of seats in the Reichstag, the president, Von Hindenburg, had no choice but to appoint Hitler to be the Chancellor.

Secondly, Mitt Romney is not an evil Adolf Hitler waiting to break out of his nice guy shell and become the most vile person on earth. Barack Obama is. And there's the difference. Not voting for Romney because he's a Mormon is a lazy man's way of saying he doesn't have enough guts to stand up for righteousness. An Obama victory means he'll have "more flexibility," and there will be no stopping his overthrow of the United States from within short of a civil war.

Another one of these self-righteous non-voters is a Florida football coach named Dave Daubenmire. He thinks Christians are ignorant if they think their vote will make any difference. I'd say Christians are ignorant if they fall for this line of thinking. We are commanded to be salt and light. Jesus told us to occupy until He comes. Romans 13 tells us to be in subjection to the government and be loyal citizens. Loyal American citizens vote!

Listen, our government is not Barack Obama! It is the United States Constitution which Obama is treading all over and will destroy if we don't stop him. The Constitution guarantees our right to vote, a right most of the world has never had, and much of the world still doesn't have. You can bet on it that this election is going to be full of fraud. There are already two cases of voting machines in early voting automatically putting in Obama's name no matter who the voter selected. There are already cases of Democrats registering people more than once, just as they did in the 2008 election. You can be sure there will be more.

The atheist Democrat machine, led by its false messiah from Kenya, is out, as it always is, to steal another election. And the stakes this time have never been greater. This is for our independence, it's for our nation, it's for our freedom, it's for America. If it turns out that it is God's will that this election will bring His judgment down on America, then so be it, but I'm not going to be one of the cowards sitting on the sideline watching it happen when we could be throwing the most vile man ever to occupy the White House out on his ear.

What if Christians had stayed home in 2000 because George Bush got arrested for drunk driving once? We'd have had Al Gore. What if they'd stayed home in 1980 because Ronald Reagan was non-denominational? We'd have had four more years of Carter. What if they'd stayed home in 1968 because Nixon was a Quaker? We'd have had Hubert Humphrey. None of those, with the exception of Gore, would ever have been as bad as Barack Obama, but if Christians stay home this time and he is reelected, we've lost America.

Whether we win the election or not, I'm not giving up until the last shot is fired, or in this case, the last vote is cast. This country has too rich a Christian heritage to just give it up to anti-Christian communists. If we don't participate in the basic responsibilities of the God given freedom we've been blessed with, we are undeserving of the freedom we enjoy. Over a million Americans have given their lives for our freedom in our 400 year history. Considering the sacrifice so many have made, it's a pathetic, ungrateful, scoundrel who won't take advantage of the most basic freedom we have to keep that freedom alive.

The argument is made that there is no scriptural mandate to vote. Look at it this way. Remember the slothful servant who hid his talent in the ground when his master went away? When the master returned he punished the servant, took his talent away from him and gave it to someone more worthy. I can just hear Fedako and Daubenmire saying that's about serving the Lord, not voting. You want a Christian perspective? How are you as a Christian going to serve the Lord when you lose your religious liberty? Eighty percent of the world's missionaries are sent from the United States. If we lose our First Amendment freedoms world-wide missions will die. Surrendering is not an option for the Christian. Disengagement is not godly, it's cowardly.

We absolutely must stay engaged. The Democrats may manage to steal this election and we may lose our country, but I'm not going to be sitting on the sidelines watching it fall apart, and neither should any Christian.

And by the way, this is not an election about the lesser of two evils. Neither may be exactly what we want, but how many candidates ever are? There's only been one Ronald Reagan in my lifetime. This election is about a decent, family man, who knows how to run a business and a government, but happens to be a member of a cult that calls itself Christian and is not; and it's about evil personified in the closet communist, muslim, community organizer who knows nothing about running a business, much less a government, and has been an absolute embarrassment on foreign policy. For the Bible believing Christian it ought to be a no brainer.

Prove your patriotism and your Christianity and VOTE!

If you don't, don't complain about what you get.

I'm In

You've heard of "Throwing your Hat in the Ring," an expression usually indicating that someone has decided to campaign for an office. A couple weeks ago I heard Roseanne Barr, the leftist, National Anthem mocking comedienne, announce that she is running for president on the Peace and Freedom Party ticket. Her agenda is flatly stated; socialism.

Now several people have suggested I run for office and I haven't taken them seriously because I am occupied in what I think is a more important profession. But then I saw Barr's announcement and I thought, Why not? I'm in! I don't mean for a local or state office, not even Congress. I'm going for the whole enchilada. I'm running for president of these United States of America. And why not? I've got at least as much experience and a whole lot more common sense than the current White House Occupant (WHO).

Let me explain to you my qualifications and why I'm a better choice than the WHO.

Citizenship: I'm a Birther. There won't be any controversy over my birth certificate or my college transcripts. It's all there for everybody to see and I won't be wasting any money trying to hide it. Transparency will be the real thing in my administration, not the bull we get from the WHO, because I have nothing to hide.

Experience: I haven't been the president of Princeton like Woodrow Wilson was, nor did I build a university like Thomas Jefferson did, but I was the administrator of a Bible college in Kenya for 11 years, and I did oversee building projects, as well as curriculum development. Our college wasn't large, but I ran it while building and pastoring churches at the same time, and it gave me a whole lot more executive experience than the WHO got from being a community organizer.

According to the WHO's wife, he has lived the American dream. Considering that he lived in one of the wealthiest subdivisions in Jakarta for several years and has been spoon-fed everything he's ever gotten in life, including his college education, I would question whether he even knows what the American dream is. For that matter, I wonder why the First Spouse was never proud of America before the WHO became a candidate for president if he had lived the American dream. She should have been proud all along that he could do it.

I have lived the real American dream. Got my first job when I was 11 years old, built a dune buggy in high school, paid my own way through college and played the Great American Pastime, baseball, became a Marine and then a pilot. I'm not one of those greedy rich with millions in the bank like the WHO, but I own two houses, and I am one of those evil landlords that make money off a rental property.

I have, by the way, spent millions of dollars. When I went through flight school it was estimated that the cost of training one military pilot was 1.5 million. The average cost of flying the A-4 during my tenure in the Corps and the Navy was about 45,000 per flight hour. I logged over 2300 hours in the air, which means I spent or used $103,500,000 during my military career, and all in the line of duty. I used tax payer dollars in service to the country unlike the WHO, who costs the US taxpayer 1.4 billion dollars a year to haul him and his entourage all over the country and the world, half the time for vacations, golf, or campaign fundraisers. I'm a bargain in comparison.

Economics: I believe in laissez-faire free enterprise trickle down Reagonomics. Much to the consternation of the WHO and in direct contradiction to what he and his lackeys have been spewing since the Democrat convention, IT DOES WORK!!! IT HAS ALWAYS WORKED. IT WILL ALWAYS WORK. Every economic recovery or period of growth since the Federal Income Tax was instituted 99 years ago has come about because of tax cuts. It worked with Eisenhower, with Kennedy, with Reagan, with Clinton, in spite of his gargantuan lie at the convention, and with Bush II. The strongest of these, the one that produced four straight budget surpluses under Clinton, also cut spending (forced upon him by the Republican controlled Congress led by Newt Gingrich). It's the only way we will ever tackle the 16 trillion dollar deficit, half of which has been accumulated since the Democrats took over Congress in 2006, and more than a third of which has been added since the WHO took office less than four years ago.

The WHO believes in redistributing the wealth, which in everybody else's terms is socialism, no matter how much the WHO or the Democrats deny it. Let's get something straight. IT DOESN'T WORK. IT NEVER HAS WORKED, AND IT NEVER WILL WORK.

Foreign Policy: I am still amazed at the gall of the Obama campaign in 2008 and its lapdog media agents who excoriated Sarah Palin for not having the knowledge or personality to deal with foreign policy issues. She had been the mayor of a town and was the governor of Alaska, she had executive experience, was firm in her positions, solid in her determination, yet they castigated her for lack of experience, all the while ignoring the fact that the WHO had never even run a lemonade stand, and knew nothing on foreign policy.

The Obama Doctrine is to weaken our military and bow before Muslim leaders. He told us that by his very election he would show the world the US has changed and they would talk to him and that would bring about peace. In fact, three years after the WHO's groveling apology tour, he still hasn't dialogued with any significant Middle Eastern leader, and now anti-American protesters have attacked our embassies all across the region and murdered four Americans including an ambassador. That is not a "bump in the road," it is an abject failure.

I've lived 15 years of my life overseas, stayed in the homes of dirt poor people, ate meals in some of the most out of the way places with no sanitation, survived a revolution, a volcanic eruption, and dengue fever, dealt with corrupt government officials including immigration agents, attorneys, judges, and policemen. I won't make the mistake of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood or any government that hates us. By the way, one of the first places we can save money is by cutting foreign aid all across the board, with the exception of Israel.

Military: Peace Through Strength. Recapture Reagan's vision and build our forces back to the number one status in the world. Power projection will do more for peace and keeping our embassies protected than bowing to Muslim leaders and dialoguing. Bring our troops home and give them some R and R. Let the rest of the world take care of its own problems, but have our military ready to pounce anywhere at anytime when Americans are threatened or in danger.

Immigration: Legal immigration for qualified people who want to come to America to become Americans. No more immigration lottery. No amnesty for illegal aliens. Require E-verify for employers, jail and/or deport every illegal caught in a crime, and allow "law-abiding" illegals to self deport as they lose their jobs due to E-verify. Secure the border with Mexico and use the military to support the Border Patrol. End all government suits against States that have tightened their own immigration laws.

Healthcare: Repeal Obamacare. Let the States run their own programs. The only reform I would make is to allow insurance companies to sell over State lines to make the entire insurance industry more competitive. That in itself will bring the cost of medical care down. And ban pharmaceutical companies from advertising publicly. Cutting out the millions they spend for thirty second commercials followed by sixty seconds of disclaimers to prevent lawsuits in case someone gets sick from their medicine will save millions for the cost of medicine.

Pro First Amendment; the government keeps its hands off the churches, off the internet, off the radio, off of free speech. Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution and will no longer determine religious involvement in the public square. We are a free people, Christian or non-christian, and there will be no restrictions on the use of the Bible or the Ten Commandments in schools, on military bases or in government. After all, the Ten Commandments are written in stone in the US Supreme Court.

Pro Second Amendment; the government will take my guns from my cold, dead hands.

Morality: Pro-life; pro biblical marriage; no special rights or status for gays; the Defense of Marriage Act will be upheld. Repeal Roe v. Wade.

Unification: The WHO famously told us in 2007 that there is no black-America, Latino-America, Asian-America, there is just the United States of America. He promised to unify the country. Then he proceeded to play the race card the day he announced his candidacy, and today racism and class warfare in America is the worst it has ever been. Anyone who opposes the WHO is immediately decried as a racist.

He can't pull the race card on me. I've spent most of the last 13 years in Africa working with black people, and of course, I am inter-racially married. You want unity, I'm your man. You want to end racism, I'm your man.

I love America. I love our Constitution. I love our Declaration of Independence. I love our military. I love the God of our Fathers, that is, the Christian God that most all of them worshipped. I love our history, and I'm not afraid of it, neither am I afraid to say that there were no Muslims who helped build our great nation ever. America is the greatest nation on earth because America began as a Christian enterprise, became a Christian nation, grew into the world's number one power, became the greatest, if not the only true, benefactor nation in history, all because of Christianity. It is time we go back to our roots and have a rebirth of faith in what made us great.

That's as concise as I can make my platform, but it is enough to tell you how I will govern in all other areas as well. So I'm in. Now we need to spread the word and get 65 million write-in votes for me in the next thirty days....

Come to think of it, since that's probably unlikely, I'll give my vote to Mitt Romney. If I've got more experience than the WHO, then Romney has tons more, and Romney/Ryan are a whole lot closer to the principles in my platform than the WHO and the GAFFE.

It's time the WHO became the GONE.

A Serious Discussion

At another campaign stop in Las Vegas, Obama, with loosened tie and rolled up sleeves, bounced up to the podium with a grin and a chuckle, and in jocular fashion, tried to pass himself off as a cool guy, just one of the gang. Waving to his supporters he downplayed the upcoming debate condescendingly calling Romney a great debater while, with an air of false humility, lowering the expectations of his own ability. Then, following the liberal trend of ignoring what the Romney/Ryan ticket is offering, he made his own subtle attack against the Republicans implying that they have no plan, and saying this:

What I'm most concerned about is having a serious discussion about what we need to do to keep the country growing and restore security of hard-working Americans.

Actually, I think most Americans are more than willing to have a serious discussion with Obama about what he plans to do, but he's so busy campaigning and schmoozing with celebrities that he has no time to run the country or deal with foreign policy issues, much less discuss them with the common people. How serious can he be taken when leaders from all over the Middle East are at the United Nations, but Obama has no time to meet with any of them because he's being "eye-candy" on the View?

How serious can he be taken when he claims to be Israel's best friend, but can't find time to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while they are both in New York even though he had several free hours on his schedule between being on the View and his next meeting?

How serious can he be taken when two weeks after the Libyan ambassador and three other Americans were murdered he goes before the United Nations General Assembly and continues to spew the misinformation he sent his Secretary of State and UN ambassador out to disseminate that it was a spontaneous reaction to an unknown Youtube video, even after evidence has been uncovered showing that he new it was a coordinated terrorist attack within 24 hours of the events taking place?

How serious can he be taken when he leaves US diplomats unprotected after the Libyan president claims to have warned the US of the threat of an attack three days before it happened?

How serious can he be taken when he declares there is a new respect for America around the world, while Iranian president Ahmadinejad accuses America of being allied to the devil, and US embassies are being attacked, our flags being burned, and Al-Qaeda flags being raised on our embassy soil all over the Middle East and North Africa?

How serious can he be taken when his foreign policy of apology and appeasement designed to get Iran to the negotiating table and end their quest for a nuclear bomb has totally failed?

How serious can he be taken when he says the US economy is recovering after 43 straight months of unemployment above eight percent? When he says he's done more to increase our energy production than any other president, but canceled the XL pipeline and has forced scores of coal mines to close? When he's given us over 6 trillion dollars in new debt in less than four years?

How serious can he be taken when he goes on Letterman and can't answer a straight question about the national debt saying he didn't know exactly what it was when he took office? Or when he tells Letterman it is a long term problem but not a short term problem when if he doesn't address it in the short term it will grow beyond the ability to be fixed in the long term?

How serious can he be taken about medical care for seniors when he's taken 716 billion dollars out of Medicare to pay for Obamacare, which we now find out will fine any hospital that admits a Medicare patient more than one time?

How serious can he be taken when he says Obamacare will not cover abortions when we now know it will force everybody's tax dollars or insurance covereage to pay for abortion on demand, regardless of religious beliefs that are against it?

How serious can he be taken when he says the border with Mexico is secure while another border agent has been murdered and he's claiming executive privilege to protect his derelict Attorney General from the Fast and Furious investigation, or maybe his own connection to it?

How serious can he be about immigration reform when his Agricultural Department is providing training for Mexican citizens to get US food stamps?

How serious can he be taken when he's missed almost half of his national security briefings but played 104 rounds of golf?

How serious can he be taken when he claims to support the military but has taken every step possible to prevent the military from voting absentee while serving the country overseas, and has plans to decrease military spending down to almost nothing?

How serious can he be taken when he claims to be a Christian but turns his back on Christian holidays and prayer days, and refuses to speak at Christian venues unless Christian symbols are covered up, all the while quoting the Koran from memory and honoring Muslim holidays with Muslim guests including leaders of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood at the White House?

How serious can he be taken when he says he knows American history and praises the Muslim influence on our founding while denying our true Christian heritage?

How serious can he be taken when he talks about bi-partisanship and blames the Republicans for blocking progress when he refuses to meet with Republican leaders, when he can't even submit a budget that his own party will vote for, and when he bypasses the Congress, the Courts, and the Constitution by issuing unconstitutional executive orders?

The only thing we can take serious about Obama is that he is a pathological liar, that he doesn't care what we the people think, and that his Hope and Change plan for America is no hope for freedom and all change to a socialist dictatorship, which he will accomplish if he is re-elected.

Yes, let's have a serious discussion, and let's pray that Romney starts it at the first debate tomorrow night.