Presidential Leadership

For over two hundred years US presidents have faced the challenge of upholding the Constitution, securing the borders, and protecting American citizens. Some have been more successful than others, but it could be said of most of our presidents that they at least tried to do what was right for our country. That has changed.

Now we have a president who, by appointing unelected and unconstitutional “czars,” by the use of Executive fiat, and by the appointment to the Supreme Court of anti-American jurists, is trying to overturn the Constitution. He disdains the sovereignty of the country he was elected to lead and protect by refusing to secure our border with Mexico, and he could care less about the security of American citizens. While drug warlords in Mexico have spilled their war into Arizona, the president is holding border security hostage to his plan of comprehensive immigration reform. Give 12-18 million illegal aliens amnesty and he’ll build the border fence is essentially what he told Arizona Senator John Kyl in a private White House meeting.

Can the president really be believed? He promised 1200 National Guard troops to help the Border Patrol police Arizona’s border. To date the troops have received no orders. He promised 500 million to build the fence. To date nothing has been appropriated. The only thing the Obama administration has done is put up signs warning people as far as 80 miles north of the Mexican border that it is dangerous to travel any farther south, but it has done nothing to alleviate the problem. Moreover, the Justice Department is filing suit against Arizona for taking measures to protect its citizens into its own hands because of the dereliction of the president.

Even if the president got his immigration reform he still wouldn’t build the fence. The track record has proven him to be a consummate liar. He doesn’t want the fence no matter what he says about it. In fact, it is now being alleged that since he apparently doesn’t have the votes in Congress to pass his reform bill he is going to grant amnesty to illegal aliens by executive order.

Obama is showing himself to be an absolute failure as a leader. His community activism was obviously not sufficient to prepare him for the demands of office or the decision making needed in times of crisis. Even MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews, the one who gets tingles up his leg when Obama speaks, declared he is lacking in leadership after his address to the nation on the Gulf oil crisis.

The only thing he has done lately that even looks presidential is removing General Stanley McChrystal from leading NATO forces in Afghanistan. McChrystal, much like MacArthur sixty years ago, took his criticism of the president to the public. That was something the president could not abide and still maintain the dignity of his position as Commander-in-Chief. Truman had to relieve MacArthur, and Obama had to relieve McChrystal.

What was most disappointing, however, was that McChrystal didn’t stand by his criticisms when he was called to the White House. He should have known at that point his career was over, so why apologize? Rules of engagement under Obama are so similar to the ROE of Vietnam that one has to wonder if the president really wants to win that war. Our troops cannot shoot first, and when fired upon they have to wait an hour in order to determine the intent of the enemy before defending themselves.

Irony of ironies, the man Obama has chosen to replace McChrystal is General David Petraeus, the one liberal Democrats including Obama were calling “Betray us” in 2007 when he truthfully told them the surge in Iraq was working. For the ordinary right thinking person it would be humiliating to rely on Petraeus now, and for the Democrats in Congress it ought to be a slap in the face. But Democrats have no shame and now, without even an apology for his previous unjustified criticism, Obama anoints General Petraeus as the hero we must have to win. I am all in favor of this choice, but Obama needs to take the handcuffs off the soldiers and let them fight to win or the late Senator Kennedy’s prediction that this will become another Vietnam quagmire will come true.

We are suffering, and have been suffering for a long time, from a real lack of firm leadership in the presidency. JFK betrayed the Cuban freedom fighters at the Bay of Pigs while he dallied in the White House with Marilyn Monroe. LBJ took us deep into Southeast Asia with trumped up charges against North Vietnam, and then refused to let military commanders on the ground win the war. Richard Nixon could have been a great president but protecting crooked cronies on his cabinet became more important to him than the truth and it cost him everything. Gerald Ford failed to understand the mood of the country and suggesting we send troops to fight the communists in Angola caused the country to fear another Vietnam and cost him the presidency.

Jimmy Carter didn’t understand Economics 101 and led the country into a malaise (his own word). Bush 1 started out well but lost his chance at reelection when he broke his promise and raised taxes leading to a recession he denied was happening. Bill Clinton was a philandering playboy who put his own selfish lusts ahead of the interests of the country. Bush 2 also started out well but he turned out to be a globalist with no will power to keep spending under control, and no plan to see the War on Terror through to a positive conclusion.

And now we have Obama. If all we could say was “1.5 trillion dollar deficits,” it would be enough. But we can also say “Gulf oil crisis,” “Arizona border,” “Illegal immigration,” “health care,” “cap and trade,” “unemployment,” “failed stimulus package,” “attempts to buy off Congressmen,” “union payoffs,” “ACORN,” “denial of Second Amendment rights and selling our sovereignty to the United Nations,” “no understanding or appreciation of America’s history,” “disrespect abroad,” and on and on it goes. His approval rating according to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll is at 45% and dropping.

What we lack in American politics is leadership that puts America first; that loves our country more than life; that is proud to be called American, proud of America’s Christian heritage, and proud of the United States Constitution, the greatest government document ever written; that is proud of America and its accomplishments rather than apologetic for its greatness; that has a vision for the future of a free people unrestrained by excessive government regulation and socialist programs designed to make everyone equally poor; leadership that does not fear special interest groups and political correctness, but has the common sense to do and say what is right for America.

What America needs today is a statesman, a patriot in the White House. We need someone who believes the following:

“There is, in America, a greatness and a tremendous heritage of idealism, which is a reservoir of strength and goodness. It is ours if we will but tap it. And because of this – because that greatness is there – there is need in America today for a reaffirmation of that goodness and a re-information of our greatness.”

These words were spoken at a Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., March 20, 1981, by the only president in the last fifty years to have seen America as the ultimate moral good in the world, and who used that standing and influence to bring to its knees the ultimate immoral evil in the world, the Soviet Union. His name was Ronald Reagan.

What America needs today is a leader with the positive vision, the morality, the humility, and the love of country that Ronald Reagan had. Reagan was the last true statesman we have seen in American politics. The answer to our leadership problem is someone like him, but where on the horizon can we find one?

Meddling in Foreign Affairs

Sunday evening, June 13, a peaceful demonstration at Uhuru Park in downtown Nairobi was broken up by two explosions 15 minutes apart that left five dead and 75 wounded. The meeting was led by Christian ministers and politicians who oppose the new draft constitution because, among other things, it will legalize abortion. The assembly was mostly over, the politicians had left, but many were still around joining a prayer vigil and thousands were still in the park when the bombs went off.

Critics of the new draft constitution, called the "No Team," are many. Along with abortion they also object to the establishment of a Muslim court to handle all marriage and inheritance issues for Muslims. People see this as the first step toward a Muslim push for an autonomous zone similar to what they've done in Mindanao in the Philippines. The fear is that Muslims will claim Mombasa and much of the coastline as their inheritance and drive all land owners not of the Muslim faith out. This could set the stage for a civil war.

Another clause that may affect missionaries allows the government to reclaim all "lease-hold" land when their 99 year leases expire. Lease-hold land is rented on a 99 year lease which has to be renewed with the government at the end of the lease. Under the new constitution these 99 year leases will not be renewed. Renters of lease-hold land stand to lose everything. This would primarily affect whites, mostly British, whose forbears settled here in Kenya's infancy, developed the land, built homes, businesses and basically the entire infrastructure. In the long run it would also affect missionaries who have purchased land for churches and schools. It sounds a whole lot like what is going on in Zimbabwe right now.

Uhuru Kenyatta, son of the first president, Jomo Kenyatta, and a former member of an outlawed blood cult called the Mungiki, who is now the Minister of Finance, is campaigning vigorously for the passage of the constitution. He was quoted by the Daily Nation as saying on Saturday June 12, "It is true that there are some issues in the law, and which Kenyans have pointed out, but this should not deter us from getting a new constitution. The opponents are using these contentious clauses to woo Kenyans to vote against it while they can be amended later."

This movement for a new constitution has been going on for over a decade. When President Kibaki was elected in 2002, he ran on a platform promising a new constitution. His administration dilly-dallied, however, and nothing was done until his first term was almost over. Then in a last minute bid to restore people's confidence a new draft constitution was hurriedly put together and rushed to a vote. It was soundly defeated.

Now, three years later, another draft constitution has been submitted to be voted on August 4. Both the president and Prime Minister Raila Odinga support the new draft. However, it does not appear to have popular support among the people. Then this peaceful "NO" demonstration was violently ended by the bombing.

You almost can't help but think somebody in favor of the constitution is behind this, and that would probably mean somebody high up in the government. Odinga was quick to ask the NO team not to accuse the YES team, and in all fairness, Odinga is right. A panic rush to judgment before an investigation is carried out would probably lead to more violence. At a June 15 reception to honor Philippine Independence Day, Kenyan Minister for Tourism, Najib Mohamed Balala affirmed that this was a criminal act, not a political one, that tourists are not being targeted, and that the government is investigating the incident.

Kenyatta's appeal to amend the problems later sounded very similar to something we heard in the States a few months ago about health care. Last week Vice President Joe Biden (pronounced "Bee-den" by many Kenyans) was here promising big bucks if Kenya passes this new constitution. One has to wonder if he didn't tell Kenyatta what to say, but more importantly, what is America's interest in getting this new constitution passed anyway? You don't suppose the most pro-abortion president in US history is trying to influence the abortion movement here do you? What business is it of ours anyway, and for heaven's sake, where does Biden think we're going to get the money to give to Kenya? And what makes anybody think that a new constitution is going to change Kenya's status as one of the most corrupt governments in the world? The same corrupt people will be in it with a new constitution that are in it now.

With the failing economy, 10% unemployment, the Gulf oil spill, the illegal alien war on the Arizona border, the threat of war with North Korea, the Sestak bribe, and all the other problems he's got at home, Obama needs to be careful what diplomatic missions he gets involved with. He's been a total failure at foreign policy so far. Now my workers are telling me that Biden's visit and this bombing are going to do more to turn people against this constitution than anyone can imagine. Come August 4, we'll find out. If the new draft constitution goes down to defeat it will just be more evidence that Obama is out of his league in foreign diplomacy, and another stain on his already soiled administration.

Remembering Two Great Americans

Six years ago today the greatest president of the 20th century, Ronald Reagan, was laid to rest at his presidential library in Simi Valley, California. Lest we forget, Reaganomics turned the Carter recession of 1980 around and gave us six years of the greatest expansion of the US economy in history. It was Reagan's hard hand, moral high ground and military build up that forced Gorbachev to start Perestroika and Glasnost in the USSR. Let us also not forget that those programs were not designed to dismantle the Soviet Union as Time magazine so piously announced when they named Gorbachev man of the decade in 1990. Those programs were designed to try and rescue the Soviet Union from its impending economic collapse, and they did not work.

The Soviet Union came apart in 1991 and ceased to exist on Christmas Day of that year. What a fitting day that was, and a fitting gift from God to all the world that the atheist USSR disappeared from history. But it happened as Reagan predicted it would. Reagan always had a positive vision for the future of America, and if we can get the conservative movement in America and the Republican Party back to Reagan's policies, maybe "there will always be a brighter day ahead." I miss Ronald Reagan and all that he stood for in America.

The other one I miss passed off the scene thirty-one years ago today. Known as "Duke," he became the number one conservative in Hollywood at a time when communists were trying to take over the industry. He stood for the American value of liberty and was very loudly outspoken about his beliefs. He became an institution, a living legend, and a symbol of all that was great about America. Mostly through western films, John Wayne became America's quintessential hero.

Duke Wayne has received a lot of criticism, particularly by leftists, because he never served in the armed forces, and while other movie stars had enlisted he was still making movies and money in Hollywood. There is a very interesting story behind all that and I recommend a book to you called, "John Wayne; the Man Behind the Myth," by Michael Munn.

Munn is a British author who has no agenda in American politics, but had several personal interviews with John Wayne and many other Hollywood figures who knew him well. The truth of John Wayne's military service is this. He applied for the Naval Academy out of high school but didn't get an appointment. He then went to USC on a football scholarship but a shoulder injury ended his football career and disqualified him from the draft. He was also deferred from the draft because he was 34 years old and had four children. Still, the criticism goes, other movie stars enlisted and served even though they had large families. The fact of that is, most of them wound up serving in rear echelon service areas and not on the front lines. Only Jimmy Stewart and Clark Gable of already established movie stars at the time actually went into combat. John Wayne did try to enlist, but he was an up and coming star at Republic studios and he had a long term contract from which the studio would not allow him to get out.

Everything seemed to be against him trying to serve so he became the number one cheer leader for the American effort in the war through his movies. He went on a USO tour in 1943 to the South Pacific. I have a book called, The Bushmasters, about a special forces unit that went behind Japanese lines. They were surprised one day to see the Duke visiting them. The author claims John Wayne begged their commander to let him go with them on a mission, but he was denied.

John Wayne became such a huge rallying figure for America, that both Joseph Stalin in 1950, and later Mao Tse-Tung put contracts out on his life. In a very interesting real life story, John Wayne helped FBI agents capture his intended assassins from the USSR. On another occasion, Yakima Canutt, the greatest of all movie stunt men, put his stable of stunt men on the prowl looking for more agents and caught two of them at Durango, Mexico, where John Wayne was making a movie. It was Nikita Krushchev who finally called off the contract after he met John Wayne and the Duke told him what he thought of communism.

The stories are verified by interviews with Yakima Canutt, Peter Cushing, and other notable movie stars including Orson Welles, who was as far left a liberal as anybody and no friend of John Wayne. But there were many in Hollywood who knew the stories. John Wayne kept it all a secret so that his family wouldn't be worried!

Don't let anybody fool you. John Wayne deserves to have his face on Mt. Rushmore along with Ronald Reagan. I hope they are both resting in peace.

Memorial Day

One of the finer things the medium of television has ever produced is the Turner Pictures 1993 movie, Gettysburg. Based on the Michael Shaara book, The Killer Angels, it is a slightly fictionalized but extremely accurate depiction of the three-day battle July 1-3, 1863, that became the “ebb tide” of the Confederacy in the American Civil War. The climax of the movie is Pickett’s charge performed by over 3,000 Civil War re-enactors.

The first time I watched it I was so overwhelmed by the awe of the charge I almost cried. Looking across that field at the 3,000, I tried to imagine what the actual attack with five times that many soldiers coming must have looked like. And then the carnage; half of them, 7,500, dead or wounded when it was over.

There is a very tender scene in the movie on the evening of the second day. Confederate General Lewis Armistead, played by Richard Jordan, is at the headquarters of General James Longstreet, played by Tom Berenger. In the background a Rebel crooner is singing Kathleen Mavourneen, the mournful Irish tune about lovers saying good-bye, while the generals reminisce about their days in California before the war. Armistead remarks that they had sung that same song at dinner the night before he, Longstreet, and General Richard Garnett left to join the Confederate army.

Also at the dinner was Armistead’s best friend, Winfield Scott Hancock, who now commanded the Union II Corps on the opposite side of the field. Tears well in Armistead’s eyes as he wonders what fate had brought them to this hour. The next day at the height of the charge his brigade pierced the Union line briefly, and both he and Hancock were wounded.

The performance by Richard Jordan was touching, but it is even more moving if you know the history and the events that followed. For Richard Jordan it may have been his finest performance. It was also his last. He died of a brain tumor less than a year later before the movie was released. His character, “Lo” Armistead, was a tragic figure as well. Armistead had been married twice, but both wives died, one of fever and one of cholera, and two of his three children had also died. His wounds in the battle were only minor in one arm and one leg, neither requiring amputation and neither considered to have been life threatening. But two days later he suddenly died for unknown reasons at the age of 46. It has been suggested that he simply had no more will to live.

One of the sad tragedies of the Civil War was that it divided families and friends. Brothers fought against brothers, fathers against sons, and friends turned against each other. Some developed bitter, life-long hatreds that no peace or reconstruction could heal. It seemed to be, as William Seward called it, an “irrepressible conflict” fought so fanatically that more American fighting men lost their lives in that war than all other wars America has been involved in combined.

One thing the Civil War illustrates clearly is that when the American soldier has been called to duty, no matter what reason or where, no matter how daring or deadly, he has gone to war with energy and resolve, loving country more than even his own life.

From the freezing winters at Valley Forge to Yorktown, from Ft. McHenry to New Orleans, to Chapultepec in Mexico; to Bull Run, Chancellorsville, Gettysburg, the river of death called Chickamauga, and a quiet church in the wilderness known as Shiloh; to San Juan Hill in Cuba and Manila Bay; the trenches in France and the break through at Belleau Wood; from Pearl Harbor to a thousand locations across the Pacific and throughout Europe, to the frozen Chosin Reservoir on the Korean peninsula, the steaming jungles of Southeast Asia, Hue and Khe Sanh, the Balkans and Africa; and today in the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, American servicemen and women have done their duty in the harshest conditions and loneliest places on earth. They have endured and risen victorious because of the great love they have for their country.

Another popular song during the Civil War was Tenting on the Old Campground. It speaks of lonely soldiers far from home, wishing for the war to end, of their wives’ prayerful vigils and of their comrades already gone. Not well known today, it is a poignant, reminisceful tune that gets to the heart of the serviceman’s feelings on distant battlefields.

We are tenting tonight on the old campground,
Thinking of days gone by,
Of the loved ones at home that gave us the hand,
And the tear that said, “Good-bye!”

Many are the hearts that are weary tonight,
Wishing for the war to cease;
Many are the hearts that are looking for the right
To see the dawn of peace.
Tenting tonight, tenting tonight,
Tenting on the old campground.

This Memorial Day as we celebrate with cookouts and family outings, watch the “Memorial Day Classic” Indy 500, or the NASCAR 600 mile race at Charlotte Motor Speedway, go to church, watch or play baseball, let us not forget our fighting men and women who are in harm’s way. They are the ones this holiday is about. They are serving to preserve for us the freedom to have our picnics and our celebrations. They are serving to preserve freedom for liberals who loathe them, and for a president who wants to cut their pay and make them buy their own medical insurance. They are far from home, often lonely, thinking of family and loved ones. When you pray this Memorial Day, don’t forget to remember our men and women in uniform and ask that they’ll be brought safely home, and that those who will give “the last full measure of devotion,” may be safely carried to an eternal home in peace.

God Bless the American serviceman.

America the Beautiful

America the Beautiful is one of our finer patriotic songs. With a majestic melody it describes every corner of the country, from mountains to prairies, and from sea to shining sea under the vast, spacious sky above. It describes the pilgrims and heroes who settled and built the land, and appeals to God for His grace and hand on our country at the close of every verse.

I first learned the song in the fourth grade. Today they don’t teach it in public schools anymore because the references to God might offend some atheist or Moslem, or be considered by someone to be establishing a religion. More’s the pity.

The Robert Shaw Chorale put out a patriotic album in the 60’s that included America the Beautiful, and I was listening to it on a CD and singing along in the car as I was going across town. All of a sudden the last line of the second verse jumped out at me.

Confirm thy soul in self-control, Thy liberty in law!

This is what John Adams meant when he said, “We have created a government for a religious and moral people. It will work for none else.” We see more and more every day the wisdom in his comment. The more secular our nation becomes the higher crime rates we see, the more laws are needed to keep people accountable, and the fewer freedoms we have. This is not to say that America was ever a perfect utopia, but we were a vast majority Christian nation in the beginning, and when the emphasis was on Christianity and our Christian roots, we had less government control because we had less crime, and our streets and communities were safer because people understood the need and were willing to govern themselves.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the change in American culture after the Supreme Court rulings kicking God out of our public schools. Prior to the 1962 and 1963 rulings the worst problems in school were children chewing gum. Now it’s children bringing guns to school and murdering their classmates.

When people control themselves there is no crime and there is no need for excessive laws. True liberty is unrestricted as long as we abide by the existing laws, but this can only work in a true Christian community where people understand that righteous, moral living is the best way, where there is a deep, inner conviction that certain moral standards must be upheld.

This kind of conviction doesn’t come from godlessness. Neither does it come from tyrannical religious systems that serve the leadership rather than the followers. Neither can it be forced upon anyone by the government. It comes from within, from a heart that has a relationship with Jesus Christ.

When asked what the greatest commandment is Jesus responded in Matthew 22:37-39, that the first great commandment is to love God with all of your heart and soul and mind. The second great commandment, He said, is to love your neighbor as yourself.

The significance of these two commandments is this: if you love the true God and live by His standards set in the Bible, not only will your spiritual needs be met, but your social, relational needs will be met as well. The Bible tells us to obey the laws of the land. It tells us to treat our neighbors with respect. This is the recipe for peaceful, harmonious living.

Yet the best handbook on developing peaceful relationships is discarded and banned from our public schools because somebody like the atheist ACLU might be offended. The ACLU doesn’t care about peace or anything that is good for the country. All they care about is their godless agenda. The more godless the country gets, the higher the crime rates grow, and the more our lawmakers add backbreaking laws and regulations to everything we do, which ultimately steals our liberties. And that makes the ACLU happy.

The answer is to get back to our Christian roots. It is those Christian roots that teach us to confirm our souls in self-control, to voluntarily restrain our liberties within the law, and to love everyone around us. Nothing could make America more beautiful than that.

Precious in the Sight of the Lord

My cousin, Sharon, married Jim Smith and they spent 29 years in Ecuador as missionaries. They had two delightful children, Zac and Stacey. Stacey ran an orphanage and placement service all by herself in Ecuador for seven years. Zac married Mandy, and they had three children, Lizzy, Luke and Jake. Zac went to seminary and was working in a church in South Carolina when about a year ago he was diagnosed with cancer. Zac fought a valiant battle, but this afternoon at 3:05, EST, he passed away. He was 33.

I didn't know Zac well because we lived in different parts of the world. I do remember he was an energetic child with loving parents. He kept a blog called HELLO?RIGHTON! which I have followed on my blog list. He had a unique sense of humor and always posted very insightful thoughts and ideas. From all accounts by those who knew him better than I, he was a wonderful husband and father.

In February Zac made a video. It has been shown in churches all over the country and has itself been a comfort to many. It is on Youtube under the heading, "Zac's Story." If you haven't seen it yet, please take a moment to view it. It's less than five minutes long, but you will be blessed listening to his testimony.

In the past year and a half, thirteen people that I have known, including my father and grandmother, have gone through the valley of the shadow. One, Jeremy Janz, had been in a semi-comatose state for twelve years. It was a relief to see him go. Another, Jimmy Strickland, had a heart attack while in the pulpit preaching, doing what he had loved to do for the last 60 years. The youngest was our close friend, Gully, who had suffered so severely from cancer that he started hallucinating, but when the end came he raised his arms to the sky and cried out, "Praise the Lord."

Richard Smith was listening to two of his sons reading the Doxology; "Praise God from whom all blessings flow, Praise Him all creatures here below, Praise Him above ye heavenly host, Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Amen." As his sons read the Amen, Richard breathed his last.

All thirteen of these friends and relatives were Christians, and all passed peacefully into the arms of the Lord. We haven't heard the details of Zac's passing, but he was so weak I imagine he probably went quietly in his sleep.

Hearts are broken and the family is in sorrow. One cannot help but wonder why. Zac was born two months premature and struggled in an incubator. When my grandfather, his great grandfather, came to see him, Sharon was overwhelmed and began to cry. Gramps took her for a walk and said not to worry. "God has plans for that boy," he said. Indeed He did, and those plans included a ministry through his illness that touched thousands, and then an early home going, but now Zac and Gramps are reunited in heaven. As hard as it is for the family here, there is rejoicing going on across the river.

Perhaps that is why God gave us the tender message in Psalm 116:15, "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints." I can think of nothing special to say that would be a comfort to the family, but I don't think there are any better words than the passage just quoted. To know God, and to know that God knows you and has a plan for you is the greatest comfort there is. To know that because of His great love for you, He will carry you safely over to the other side is a great assurance. That doesn't make it easy, but it gives the Christian a peace that others will never know until they put their faith in the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ.

Today we say farewell to Zac Smith in the firm hope that in the providence of a loving God one day we will meet again. Many of you have been praying for Zac. Let me thank you. Let me also ask you to continue to pray for his family.

"God is still God, and God is still good" - Zac Smith.

Supreme Court

During the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton in 1998, Congresswoman Maxine Waters defended her president by complaining that our troops were in harm's way and it would be demoralizing to them to have their Commander-in-Chief convicted and removed from office. As with most Democrats, she was typically out of touch with the military. Clinton had been a draft dodger who cavorted with communists in Czechoslovakia during the Vietnam War. His removal would have been a huge morale booster to the military. Unfortunately as I watched the House vote, not one Republican in their 90 second speeches before the vote made any kind of comment concerning morale, and I wondered then if the Republicans were also losing touch, not only with the military, but with the entire population. I think the second term of W at least proved that they were.

Now we have the most liberal president in our history, an obvious socialist in spite of his scoffing at the suggestion during his campaign for president, who has accumulated more debt in one year than Bush did in one term, and more than any other presidential administration, who is usurping powers through the appointment of "czars" which have no constitutional recognition, much less authority, and is trying to ram his agenda down America's throat by by-passing Congress when he can't get something passed legitimately. He is considering making Cap and Trade, for example, an Environmental Protection Agency policy, thus giving the EPA the power to enforce it without it ever being voted on in Congress. We have never had a president more out of touch with America than the one we have now. Obama is a hopeful dictator trying to overthrow the government by decree, and what he can't get done through Congress and czars, he'll try to get done through Supreme Court appointments.

This week he nominated Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. Kagan is a Harvard law professor with no judicial experience. She is pro-homosexual rights, opposed to the Defense of Marriage Act, hostile toward faith-based organizations, anti-military, having been responsible for the removal of the ROTC from Harvard's campus and is opposed to the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, and she believes the Constitution is defective. She believes free speech can be controlled by the government and is in favor of the so-called Fairness Doctrine. She agrees with Obama that the Constitution is a "living" document, or in other words it changes and adapts to "public policy," which is whatever the president or the justices decide is right according to their own philosophies, not according to the Constitution.

With her anti-military background Kagan's appointment would be an insult to our fighting men in harm's way. So where is Maxine Waters pontificating about the morale of our troops now? Kagan is a dangerous appointment because she stands against everything that our country was founded on.

John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, said about our leaders, "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty - as well as the privilege and interest - of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians as their rulers." Kagan, with her anti-Christian position on nearly every issue, not to mention her anti-constitutional positions, is less qualified to be a Supreme Court justice than was Harriet Miers, and should be denied.

Mt. Rushmore

When I was ten years old we passed through the Black Hills on vacation and stopped at Mt. Rushmore. I was happy to see it because there was a popular joke going around at the time about a guy who climbed to the top of the mountain and fell off. He grabbed on to George Washington's nose and as he hung there he shouted to his friends, "Look, I'm a booger."

A few years later I saw the Alfred Hitchcock movie, North by Northwest, on TV. The visitor center looked just as I remembered it and I wondered for years if there was really a house and an airstrip on top of the monument. I loved that house, by the way, even if it was a 1950's design, and if I had the money I'd try to buy it no matter where it's located. And speaking of acting, watch Cary Grant's eyes. He could say more with the expression on his face than most people could say with a thousand words. Oh, isn't there a saying about that? But I digress.

Last summer we took a family vacation to Mt. Rushmore. The visitor center has grown considerably from what I remembered 44 years earlier, and I was amazed at how many people travel to that out-of-the-way place every year just to see it. It was worth the trip to see the beautiful Black Hills and stand in awe under those huge busts of four of our greatest presidents carved out of a mountain side.

George Washington has the prominent place and rightly so. "First in war, first in peace, first in the hearts of his countrymen." His character and integrity established a dignity to the office and his leadership helped a struggling Republic take its place among the community of nations and earned him the well-deserved title, "Father of Our Country." Simply put, without George Washington there would be no America.

Twentieth century revisionists have smirched and slandered his character, belittling his importance, robbing from generations of children a true hero, someone genuinely worth patterning their lives after. Richard Brookheiser, in a 1996 biography called "Founding Father," which I recommend to you, examined the works of earlier historians and the revisionists, and came to the conclusion that George Washington was the man we originally thought him to be. He was a vestryman in his parish church, quoted Scripture often, and lived by the highest moral principles. He forbad swearing and drunkenness in the Continental Army, and encouraged the troops to attend services. He often referred to Providence, a common reference to God at the time. Fully a third of his first Inaugural Address discussed the "providential agency" involved in founding the country. The cherry tree story may have been a myth, but the character it honored was every bit as true and honest in his life as was the little boy with the axe in the story. Brookheiser writes, "When he lived, Washington had the ability to give strength to debaters and to dying men. His life still has the power to inspire anyone who studies it."

Beside Washington to the right and slightly behind is the bust of Thomas Jefferson. It is a worthy position indicative of the role Jefferson played in the making of America. He was the author of the Declaration of Independence, and while he was in France serving as an ambassador during the Constitutional Convention, it was his influence through letters that led to the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution. His term as president was a period of great expansion and discovery. In 1803 the United States doubled its size with the Louisiana Purchase from France and Jefferson sent Lewis and Clark on their epic journey to explore the new territory. What Jefferson most wanted to be remembered for, however, was that he was the founder of the University of Virginia. He was an educator as well as a statesman, and one of the great forces behind the founding of our great nation.

Next to Jefferson and a little deeper into the recess of the cliffside is Teddy Roosevelt. Separated from the Founders by a hundred years, his bullish attitude reinvigorated a nation reeling from the assassination of its president in 1901. He was a war hero having led the Rough Riders up San Juan Hill in Cuba, and his motto, "Speak softly and carry a big stick," resonated with the people. Under his leadership America grew to become a major world power. He built the Panama Canal, an achievement that revolutionized trade and travel by sea, and built up the US Navy, sending thirteen state-of-the-art battleships (known as the Great White Fleet) on a world-wide good will tour in 1907. He was a man's man, an outdoorsman who loved to hunt, including lions in Africa after his presidency, and who proved his toughness by surviving an assassin's bullet later in life. He was an exciting character, never dull, a man who earned America great respect on the world stage, the man of the hour to lead the nation into the twentieth century.

Separated slightly to the right and looking back across the other three faces is the one many esteem as our greatest, or second greatest president next to Washington, Abraham Lincoln. The slight division in the rock face of the cliff seems poetically appropriate since he served as president during America's division in the Civil War. Lincoln gets a bad break from history. There can be no general consensus as to his accomplishments. Southerners still hate him and Northerners still love him. He's accused of overstepping his constitutional bounds, criticized for freeing the slaves as a political expediency rather than a conviction, and his character is often tarnished by those still fighting the Civil War. He was certainly an enigma. Lincoln grew up in the wilderness and never attended church, yet he knew the Bible well, quoted it often, and was known to be a man of great prayer. He was as meticulously honest as Washington, one time walking miles to return a borrowed nickel. His contemporaries thought he was unintelligent, General McClellan even called him a gorilla, but he led his administration with wisdom and skill, and it was his unbending will that held the country together through its deadliest war.

Lincoln's bust on Mt. Rushmore was uncompleted, the architect having died before the work was done. That also seems appropriate as Lincoln's life was cut short by an assassin before he could see the completion of the reconstruction of the nation he hoped for at his second inaugural. Lincoln's legacy is best described in his second Inaugural Address. "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan - to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations." These are good words for today.

With all this in mind, when we get back to the States, I think I want to go visit Mt. Rushmore again.

Arizona's Border

Is there any better proof as to why Arizona needed to pass its new Illegal Alien law than the events that have happened since it passed? Illegal aliens marched on the capitol, flew American flags upside down beneath Mexican flags, attacked police with stones and bottles, and created general mayhem. Illegal aliens came from California and other places to join in. An hispanic Arizona senator from Yuma called for a boycott of his own state. And last Friday an armed illegal alien drug smuggler shot a deputy sheriff with an AK-47 assault rifle. The search for the shooter by Arizona police netted seventeen illegal aliens.

The president called the Arizona law misguided, but the only thing misguided here is the president. The Constitution obligates the president to make sure our borders are secure. The border with Mexico is not. It hasn't been secure for decades and the government's absolute failure to enforce our own laws to keep our own sovereign soil safe from invasion has caused the foreign invaders to grow more and more belligerent coming into our country.

In 2006 the problem had become so severe that grassroots efforts pressured the Republican controlled Congress to finally do something about it. A 700 mile long double security fence was approved with such overwhelming public support that President Bush had to sign it into law. Bush had been just as derelict on the border as Clinton before him and Obama after him, but support for the fence was so great he couldn't refuse to sign the bill. Unfortunately his failing popularity due to the unending war and out of control debts led to the Republican slaughter in the 2006 elections and the Democrat controlled Congress has refused since then to fund the border fence.

The Democrats have the support of Mexican president, Calderone, who verbally chastised Arizona for its new law. Funny, isn't it, that Mexico's illegal alien laws are much more stringent than America's own laws, and you don't find Calderone inviting illegal drug smuggling killers to cross over the border from the US to terrorize his people. You don't find him inviting illegal American aliens to come over and take jobs away from the Mexican people. Calderone said essentially that Arizona's law will damage relations between our countries. I say, "Let it!" It's none of his business what we do for our own security.

What this amounts to is an attempt by Mexico to reclaim the southwestern United States by draining its resources dry and sending billions of dollars back to Mexico to help its economy. It's not a military invasion, but it's an invasion of American soil just the same. Saddest of all is that Mexico's ally in this invasion is the leftist Democrat Party.

Let's get something straight. The United States of America is a sovereign nation with a government of the people, by the people, and for the people of the United States. Nobody else has rights here. Terrorists don't have a right to be Mirandized. Illegal aliens don't have a right to our welfare, public schools, social security, jobs or anything else. The only right they have is to be deported. The sooner that is done and the border fence is completed the safer America will be.

To neglect the border and leave it open for thugs, drug smugglers and killers, and to renege on duties of office lined out in the Constitution is treasonous. If the president and the leftists in Congress are so dense that they can't figure this out, they need to be voted out in the November elections this year and in 2012.

Christian or Deist?

It is common to hear the accusation that our Founding Fathers were deists, and that they were influenced by the 17th century Rationalism of Descartes, and the 18th century Enlightenment of Rousseau. Where did these arguments come from, and are they true? Did these empty philosophies, which offer no hope for mankind, and which did greatly influence the irrational slaughter of the French Revolution and the guillotining of Louis XVI, actually impact the founding of our own nation? Those who deny our Christian heritage would like us to think so.

The truth is far different from what those revisionist historians want us to believe. One of the greatest political influences on our Founders was John Locke, a 17th century Oxford academic and medical researcher who opposed authoritarianism. Locke, who was a Christian, was considered by Thomas Jefferson to be one of the greatest men who ever lived. It was Locke's political ideas that led to the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the bloodless overthrow of British King James II.

It was the Christian religion, however, that was the driving philosophy behind the deliberations of our Founding Fathers. The Baptists had a large part to play in that. It was "that little Baptist state," as George Washington called Rhode Island, that gave the world the first ever government that was completely tolerant of all religions. And it was the Baptist influence that ensured that religious freedom became a part of our first amendment.

The Pilgrims, most of whom were Puritans from the Anglican Church of England, came to Amerca seeking religious freedom. But they were just as intolerant of any other beliefs as the Church of England was. They required membership, tithes, and infant baptism of all citizens in their colonies. Several colonies persecuted non-conformists by putting them in stocks, with beatings, or banishment, and as late as 1767, three Baptist preachers in Fredericksburg, Virginia were jailed for not submitting to the Anglican church. That church still exists in Fredericksburg, Virginia. I used to attend there when I was in the Marine Corps in Quantico.

This is what drove Roger Williams and many others to found the Rhode Island colony on the true principle of religious freedom. It is a credit to the wisdom of our Founders to have come to the realization that what they had in Rhode Island was what was needed in the new nation.

The idea that this country was built by Deists is a 20th century invention. No contemporary ever called the Founders Deists, and neither did the next three or four generations following them. In fact, in a celebrated case before the United States Supreme Court in 1892, The Church of the Holy Trinity vs. United States, Associate Justice, David J. Brewer, declared in the majority decision that all the evidence proves that America is a Christian nation. The Deist idea is a revisionist historical view that germinated in the last century and was watered by the 1962 and 1963 Supreme Court decisions to kick God, the Bible, and prayer out of our public schools. It has now become the parasitic vine that is smothering the tree and the truth.

What is Deism anyway? Deists claim that they believe in God. What god they believe in they don't really know. It is certainly not Jesus Christ, they deny His deity. Deism believes that a god created the universe and then left it alone to its own machinations. He is not a personal god, he doesn't care what happens to mankind, and he does not involve himself in the affairs of men.

Were our Founders really Deists? Is that what Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington were. Doubt is also cast upon John Adams and most of the rest of them as well. Is there any truth to these accusations?

Thomas Paine may have been a Deist. He was sort of a "Rebel Looking for a Cause." His famous pamphlet, Common Sense, stirred the passions of the colonists against the tyranny of King George III. When the American Revolution was over, he had nothing to do and went to France to try and help foment the French Revolution, but his writings were not appreciated there and he lived the rest of his life in obscurity.

Paine once wrote a pamphlet called The Age of Reason. In it he denied the Word of God and the deity of Christ. When he showed his work to Benjamin Franklin, Franklin reportedly answered with the now famous phrase, "He who spits into the wind spits into his own face."

This is the same Franklin who is positively identified by modern historians as a Deist, and is accused of having had as many as fifty children by many mistresses. (My eighth grade history teacher told my class that one.) But is that consistent with the man Franklin really was?

When George Whitfield came to America preaching in the Great Awakening, Franklin struck up a friendship with him and went to hear him speak on several occasions. Whitfield testified that although Franklin was sincerely interested in the message and spoke highly of Whitfield, as far as he knew, Franklin was never saved.

Still, Franklin had a list of maxims that he tried to live by and one of these was two simple words, "Imitate Jesus." When the convention met in 1787 to hammer out a new constitution for the country, there were so many differences of opinion in the beginning that the delegates were nearly at each other's throats. It was Franklin that took the floor and spoke saying, "If a sparrow cannot fall without the knowledge of the Almighty, can a nation be built without His guidance?" He quoted several passages of Scripture before moving that the delegates get on their knees and cry out to God for help in forging the new nation. Deists don't quote Scripture, nor do they cry out to God for help.

Thomas Jefferson is another one that modern historians most assuredly avow was a Deist. But can we find that in any of his writings? Take a look at the Declaration of Independence, which was written by Jefferson with some editing help from Franklin and Adams. In it he claims that man is "endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights."

There is an immediate problem here for Deists. They don't believe that the Creator cares at all about His creation. A Deist god would never endow creation with any rights.

It is interesting to note that every year of Jefferson's presidency he had written into his annual budgets funding for the evangelization of Indians. He is also quoted as having said, "Indeed I tremble for my country when I consider that God is just, and that His justice will not sleep forever." A Deist god could not be just, neither would a Deist tremble at the thought of judgment.

George Washington also gets a poor hearing from modern historians. His integrity is challenged. It is claimed he sired children with his slaves. (That idea was suggested by the British historian, Sir Arnold Toynbee, without the first hint of evidence.) The truth is he was a member of the Episcopal Church. He was a man of the highest character and probity, and a man of such stature and dignity that people felt small and humbled just to be in his presence. Of all the writings and testimonies of his contemporaries, both friends and enemies, not one person that ever knew him ever wrote one negative thing about him. He was a man of honor and well deserving of the title, "Father of Our Country."

It is my opinion that he was the greatest American that ever lived. We literally would not have had a country without him. His leadership as commanding general of the Continental Army, and his presence as the President of the Constitutional Convention, as well as being our first president, assured America's place in history. And if you'll take time to read his farewell address to the army and his proclamation of the first Thanksgiving Day holiday, you will be hard pressed not to believe that he was truly a Christian.

While Washington was the Father of our Country, James Madison was given the title, "Father of the Constitution." Madison declared that they had created a government based on the principles found in the Ten Commandments and the New Testament. Obviously Madison believed America was a Christian nation.

There is so much more that even a modest amount of research could find. Those claiming the Founders were Deist are either too lazy to search for the truth, or they are intentionally trying to cover it up in order to push their own anti-Christian agenda.

We were definitely founded as a Christian nation. Whether or not we are today is another story, but the second president, John Adams, has the answer for us. One day as he sat in the Continental Congress, Benjamin Rush asked him in a whisper if he thought America would succeed against the British. Adams replied, "Yes, if we fear God and repent our sins."

That was good advice in his day, and we would be well advised to do the same in our own day.